


A fictional story. This story is based on SM’s journey with AI. St. Brigid School and everyone in it are made up. The bumps and the lessons are real.
Who did what. Michelle Cho and Jorge Ledezma chose the story, wrote the character sheets and picture descriptions, directed and approved every change, and checked the facts against SM’s documents. Claude, an AI model made by Anthropic, drafted and revised the words from our notes. Gemini, an AI image model made by Google, generated every picture; none were drawn by hand. When a picture was wrong, we asked for a new one.
Our AI use level: AI-Enhanced. Using SM’s faculty AI guidelines, we place this book at AI-Enhanced: part of the content was generated by AI, and we disclose it. The cover names Claude as a co-writer; in a formal citation, AI is cited as a tool, not an author.
We take responsibility. We are responsible for everything in this book, including the parts made with AI.
Cho, M., & Ledezma, J. (2026). The lantern and the promise: The whole story, bumps and all [Picture book]. Santa Margarita Catholic High School.
AI tools used are cited above, under Tools we used.
For every SM student
still learning to do the walking.


















| The lantern | Generative AI tools (ChatGPT arrived November 2022; students knew before staff) |
|---|---|
| The big NO sign, the waiting | The first AI policy (March 2023): banned unless explicitly allowed; a lot of "let's wait and see"; students got no guidance or clarity |
| The dragon worksheet | "Magical AI thinking": hallucinations went unchecked; teachers reported false sources, quotes and resources |
| The Sniffer | AI detection tools the school tried (Turnitin, CopyLeaks) became the focus over guidance; teachers acted as monitors more than mentors; parent concerns about accuracy led the school to rely on it less |
| The Oak Table | The Innovation Taskforce: administrators, teachers, students and parents. "We moved from NO to KNOW" |
| The faded signs | The stoplight framework: adopted, but hardly used; most teachers did not embrace it |
|---|---|
| Two rooms | A fragmented faculty: the same student meets different AI expectations in every class |
| Lunch and Learn | AI Thursday, Lunch and Learns, Tech Mentors: a few regulars; some teachers never came |
| The promise | The student-adopted Honor Code Pledge (January 2026) and Honor Reps; the Honor Code is one of the "first steps" on the path to human formation |
| What counts? | Confusion about what the pledge means with AI, and uneven buy-in among teachers and students |
| Just a scribble | A pledge on every assignment turning performative |
|---|---|
| "The hard part" | Productive struggle instead of "doing school" |
| The lantern's best job | The PLC portal: teachers using AI to look at student work together and respond as a community; not every teacher took part |
| Two ways to build | Pope Leo XIV, Magnifica Humanitas (2026): "constructing Babel or rebuilding Jerusalem" (Genesis 11; Revelation 21) |
| Heart, mind and soul | SM's whole-person formation, "Forming the Whole Human Person to live out Caritas Christi": human, intellectual and spiritual formation build on one another; "Without a solid human formation, a student's intellectual and spiritual growth can be hindered" |
| Still building | Our AI journey is still unfolding |
|---|
The lantern can light the way.
But you have to do the walking.